Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hsi [2025/08/25 18:26] – admin
+++ hsi [2025/08/25 20:22] (current) – admin
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 A. Gsponer. Ted Taylor's last disarmament project  |{{:publications:isri-04-17.pdf|ISRI-04-17}}
-A. Gsponer. CERN — L’atome piégé par le ”Plan Marschall”|La Recherche, No. 381 (Paris, décembre 2004) 6. |[[http://www.larecherche.fr/content/recherche/article?id=2842|ISRI-04-16r (extraits)]]
-A. Gsponer, J. Grinevald. CERN — La physique des particules piégée par l’OTAN|La Gazette Nucléaire, No. 217/218 (Orsay, novembre 2004) 9–10. |[[http://resosol.org/Gazette/2004/217_218_p09.html|ISRI-04-16]]
-C. Rubbia, R. Klapisch .L'utilité de l'antimatière|In: Actes du colloque commémorant le 40ème anniversaire du CEA (oct. 1985)(( Actes du colloque commémorant le 40ème anniversaire du Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique à Paris le 14 octobre 1985)). Extraits en réponse à des questions de M. Clarke ((animateur du débat sur le thème de la recherche fondamentale))|[[http://cui.unige.ch/isi/ssc/phys/Rubbia-Klapisch.html|ISRI-04-15]]
 A. Gsponer. A comparison of delayed radiobiological effects of depleted-uranium munitions versus fourth-generation nuclear weapons|in: Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. of the Yugoslav Nuclear Society, Belgrade, Sep.30-Oct.4, 2002 (14 pp.)|[[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0210071|ISRI-02-07]]|
-A. Gsponer. From the lab to the battlefield? Nanotechnology and fourth generation nuclear weapons|Disarmament Diplomacy, No. 67 (October-November 2002) 3–6. ((slightly expaned version with a few additional end-notes and references))|[[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0509205|ISRI-02-06]]|
+A. Gsponer. From the lab to the battlefield? Nanotechnology and fourth generation nuclear weapons. Disarmament Diplomacy, No. 67 (October-November 2002) 3–6. ((slightly expaned version with a few additional end-notes and references))|[[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0509205|ISRI-02-06]]|